In my
opinion the problem with this situation is not who should be blamed for the
tragedy. Obviously the loss of a life is horrible but I don’t think anyone
needs to be blamed for it. The medical student’s intent for his article was to
help elderly citizens make a difficult decision, not assist a teenager in
suicide. The weblog cannot be to be blame because a blog is supposed to be a
way for individuals to express their opinions and should not be monitored by
the blog. Blaming the teenager would
also be unreasonable because teenagers are some of the most unstable and
irrational people. If the teenager was predisposed to committing suicide than I
doubt the medical student’s article did anything to advance that decision. If
anything I would place the most blame on the parents of the teenager. This
story does not give enough information regarding how informed the parents were
of how emotionally unstable their child was. If the parents had a vast
knowledge of how ill their child was then they should have sought help for
him/her immediately. This help may have included restricting his/her internet
access, I am no expert on dealing with emotionally unstable teens but it would
seem that not allowing them access to a page talking about suicide would be
valid. I would never charge a parent who has lost a child as being negligent or
even bad parents unless the circumstances directly pointed to that, which
doesn’t seem to be the case in this situation.
I don’t feel it is necessary to
charge anyone with a crime in this situation, however if the parents felt that
someone was at fault then it would not be ridiculous for them to charge someone
since they are in such an unfortunate and probably emotional state.
Addressing the ethics of the medical student’s blog
post in another situation entirely from the criminal aspects of this case.
Again, I don’t claim to be an ethics expert but perhaps the student should have
thought a little more about who could access his blog. The medical students
should have understood that the world is filled with unstable people who are
considering suicide, in fact the Nation Institute of Mental Health estimates
that “26.2%”[1] of
Americans suffer from some sort of mental illness. I don’t wish to make any
statements about the ethics of the student, he surely regrets that the
information he provided was used in the suicide of a teenager. The student was
attempting to provide a service to a certain group and the information
unfortunately fell into the dangerous hands of an unstable teen. We cannot
fault the student for his intent, his execution could have been better.
The tragedy does not require that
someone get blamed. Instead we all need to understand that there are sick
people in the world and that anything that is posted to the internet can be
accessed by these people. Everyone involved in the case probably feels some
sort of responsibility for the suicide, whether it be the student, the weblog,
or the parents, but no one can be, or should be fully blamed. I would hope a
real court would find something similar. My view is that it is extremely
unfortunate that there is some belief in our country that when a tragedy like
this one occurs that someone is financially responsible and the first choice is
to go to court and have the court decide who’s fault it is. A better view would
be to reflect on how we can ensure that this doesn’t happen again or at least
happens less frequently.